Review PaperAccess to treatment with controlled medicines rationale and recommendations for neutral, precise, and respectful language
Introduction
Recently, on behalf of their organizations, five authors from our author group, representing the European Pain Federation EFIC, the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care, International Doctors for Healthier Drug Policies, the Swiss Romandy College for Addiction Medicine, the Swiss Society of Addiction Medicine, and the World Federation for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence called on medical journals world-wide (editors-in-chief, editors, and reviewers) to ensure that authors use neutral, precise, and respectful wording.1
The call, an opinion piece, was perforce brief, and we could not in detail describe the language that we consider appropriate. With this article, we provide additional inappropriate terms, explanation, and alternatives. We do so on a personal title.
Section snippets
Similar calls in the past
This call was not the first for neutral, precise, and respectful wording regarding the use of psychoactive substances. In 2014, the Editorial Team of the journal Substance Abuse called on its authors, reviewers, and readers to use language that makes an appeal for respecting people (‘people-first language’), focusing on the medical nature of substance use disorders and treatment, to promote the recovery process and to avoid perpetuating negative stereotypes and biases.2 Ironically, they found
More change is needed than you think
The sources we cited here focus almost entirely on people who use psychoactive substances and treatment of substance use disorders. However, we would argue that more treatments and more people are affected:
- 1.
Terminology related to psychoactive substances affects treatment of all disorders and diseases that require availability and accessibility of controlled medicines, including opioids (for treatment of moderate and severe pain, dyspnea, and for opioid agonist treatment of opioid dependence),
Cultural, temporal, and geographical variation
The appropriateness of terms is not absolute. It is dependent on the perception of a word by the emitters and receptors of messages. This means that it can (and will) change over time; it can be perceived in different ways by different subpopulations. Subpopulations may be different groups within one local community but also speakers of the same language in different regions. For English, being spoken in so many parts of the world, the connotation of a word will not necessarily need to be the
Undesirable terminology
We identified a number of terms which are problematic when used in the medical domain with explanation on problems and alternatives (Table 1). We also suggest some alternative terms that may be appropriate under certain circumstances only.
Using undefined or ill-defined terms is imprecise and affects the quality of science. We found that some people use definitions deviating from what has been agreed internationally, sometimes even opposite to these official definitions (e.g. defining
Acknowledgements
The table in this article was drafted as part of a campaign promoting terminology that enhances a respectful approach of people who use controlled substances and to promote access to controlled substances, e.g. for the treatment of opioid dependence and the treatment of pain. The campaign is conducted by International Doctors for Healthier Drug Policies, the Swiss Romandy College for Addiction Medicine, the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care, the European Pain Federation
References (32)
- et al.
Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms
Int J Drug Policy
(2010) - et al.
Adequacy of opioid analgesic consumption at country, global and regional level in 2010, its relation to development level and changes compared to 2006
J Pain Symptom Manag
(2014) - et al.
HIV prevention, treatment, and care services for people who inject drugs: a systematic review of global, regional, and national coverage
Lancet
(2010) - et al.
Medical journals are responsible for terminology because of patient access
BMJ
(19 April 2017) - et al.
Confronting Inadvertent stigma and pejorative language in addiction scholarship: a recognition and response
Subst Abuse
(2014) ISAJE terminology statement
Nord Alkohol Nark
(2015)- Journal of Addiction Medicine. Language and terminology guidance for journal of addiction medicine (jam) manuscripts....
Make your words support your message
J Pain Pall Care Pharmacother
(2015)- et al.
Negative outcomes of unbalanced opioid policy supported by clinicians, politicians, and the media
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother
(2016) - et al.
Alcohol/drug/substance “abuse”: the history and (Hopeful) demise of a pernicious label
Alcohol Treat Q
(2011)