Short CommunicationMuch ado about nothing? Legacy tobacco advertising and the role of public health
Section snippets
Ethical approval
None sought.
Funding
None declared.
Competing interests
The author certifies that he has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject
References (10)
- et al.
Which nanny—the state or industry? Wowsers, teetotallers and the fun police in public health advocacy
Public Health
(2015) Nudgers vs. Nannies
Reason
(2011)- et al.
Adventures in Nannydom: reclaiming collective action for the public's health
J Law Med Ethics
(2015) Bloomberg's health legacy: urban innovator or meddling Nanny
Hastings Cent Rep
(2013)U.S. tobacco control: public health, political economy, or morality policy?
Rev Policy Res
(2008)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (2)
© 2017 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.