Elsevier

Public Health

Volume 140, November 2016, Pages 258-260
Public Health

Short Communication
Gender differences on the interacting effects of marital status and health insurance on long-term colon cancer survival in California, 1995–2014

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.07.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The main effects of age, gender, marital status, health insurance and poverty on cancer survival are well known.

  • Interactions explain four-fold more variability than main effects in USA cancer survival.

  • The more diverse a population the more important it is to study health risk interactions.

Section snippets

The cohort

Six thousand three hundred people diagnosed with colon cancer between 1995 and 2000 were randomly selected from the California cancer registry that was joined to the 2000 census by census tracts and followed until 2014. The original cohort oversampled the poor by stratifying as follows: a third each from high poverty neighbourhoods where 30% or more of the households were poor, 5%–29% were poor or where less than 5% were poor. This study then secondarily analysed the survival of 3021 women and

The complex interaction

The hypothesized five-way interaction was significant. Along with main effects, it could explain 42% of the variability in long-term colon cancer survival. All of the aggregate main effects alone could only explain 10% of such survival variability. Moreover, it suggested larger disadvantages among non-Medicare-eligible people, but there was not enough power to confidently describe all of the adjusted effects across the five-way interaction's numerous strata.

The significant four-way interaction,

Interpretation

Previous analyses of this California cohort of colon cancer patients focused on those who lived in poverty. We systematically replicated the fact that main effects alone, including race/ethnicity, explained well their long-term survival. The story seemed quite different, however, among the population of this study's central focus, those who did not live in profound poverty. Such diverse people are the near poor and members of the working class as well as members of the lower to upper middle

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the administrative assistance of Kurt Snipes, Janet Bates and Gretchen Agha of the Cancer Surveillance and Research Branch, California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and Dee West and Marta Induni of the Cancer Registry of Greater California (CRGC). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the research, technical or editorial assistance of Glen Halvorson, Donald Fong and Arti Parikh-Patel of the CRGC and Madhan Balagurusamy, Nancy Richter, Daniel Edelstein

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (10)

  • N. Krieger

    Epidemiology and the web of causation: has anyone seen the spider?

    Soc Sci Med

    (1994)
  • E.O. Wilson

    Consilience: the unity of knowledge

    (1998)
  • S. Greenland et al.

    Concepts of interaction

  • K.J. Rothman et al.

    Causation and causal inference in epidemiology

    Am J Public Health

    (2005)
  • K.M. Gorey

    Breast cancer survival in Canada and the United States: meta-analytic evidence of a Canadian advantage in low-income areas

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2009)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text