Letter to the EditorDiscounting role in cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination by Starkie Camejo et al. (Public Health Vol 129(7):989–92)
Section snippets
Ethical approval
None sought.
Funding
None declared.
Competing interests
TB; RD and NL are employees of Sanofi Pasteur MSD.
References (15)
- et al.
Does it matter? Discounting and its role in the cost-effectiveness of preventative interventions. The case of HPV vaccination
Public Health
(2015 Jul) - et al.
Comparative cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a transmission-dynamic modelling study
Vaccine
(2013) - et al.
Assessment of herd immunity and cross protection after a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in Australia: a repeat cross-sectional study
Lancet Infect Dis
(2014) - et al.
Cross-protective efficacy of two human papillomavirus vaccines: a systematic review meta-analysis
Lancet Infect Dis
(2012) Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine (Gardasil®): a review of its use in the prevention of premalignant anogenital lesions, cervical and anal cancers, and genital warts
Drugs
(2014)- et al.
Comparing bivalent and quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: economic evaluation based on transmission model
BMJ
(2011) Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice
(2014)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (0)
Copyright © 2015 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.