Original ResearchLinking health states to subjective well-being: an empirical study of 5854 rural residents in China
Introduction
Subjective well-being (SWB) is defined as people's emotional and cognitive evaluations of their lives.1 These evaluations include people's emotional reactions to events, their moods, and judgments about their life satisfaction.2 Happiness is used interchangeably with life satisfaction in literature as synonyms of SWB.3 But researchers have pointed out that happiness can mean a global evaluation of life satisfaction, living a good life, or a general positive mood.4 Life satisfaction is thus subsumed within happiness according to the definitions aforementioned, which implies that happiness is more akin to SWB.5 As a result, happiness was chose as SWB proxy in this study.
Psychologists have conducted numerous studies on the relationship between health states and happiness.6 But most of them were small in scale and had problems in generalizability.7 Despite the growing interest in the use of SWB for public policy purposes to gauge social progress and sustainable development,8, 9 the attempts to relate SWB and health states using large-sample national datasets are far from enough,10 and the role health states play in individuals' SWB remains indefinite as yet.11
Health states can be indicated by either subjective health status (evaluated by respondents themselves) or objective health status (assessed by medical personnel). Studies that examined the association between subjective health status and SWB usually used answers to the self-rated health question as the health variable.12 The typical question is ‘All in all, how would you describe your state of health these days?’ with answers ranging from very poor to very good on a five-point scale. There have been population-based researches in Sweden, US, Latin America and Russia, and the results all suggested a strongly positive health-happiness correlation.13, 14 The conclusion that self-rated health is a significant predictor for SWB has also been reached in Hsieh's study of older adults15 and in a nationally representative sample of Australian rural residents.16 Blanchflower & Oswald have made comparisons of the health-happiness relation in 16 European countries and found that happier nations report fewer blood-pressure problems.17
Since literature on the relationship between SWB and self-rated health has become maturing, researchers start to examine the association between SWB and different dimensions of subjective health status measured by health related quality-of-life (HRQoL) instruments. HRQoL is multifaceted and emphasizes the subjective evaluation of physical and mental health as well as functional capacity.18 By applying HRQoL measures, the effect of different dimensions on SWB could be prioritized. Michalos employed SF-36 in his research and found that good mental health made a substantial contribution to happiness.19 EQ-5D has been included in surveys of the general population in Latin America and the older residents in the United States. Results of both studies showed that anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort and difficulties with usual activities had substantially negative effect on SWB, while the negative effect of mobility and self-care was not significant.20, 21 In a patient sample in UK, the mental health dimension (anxiety/depression) of EQ-5D had a significantly negative association with happiness, pain was less so, and the physical health dimension (mobility) had no association.22 Despite the growing interest in determining the relationship between different dimensions of subjective health status and SWB in Western countries, hardly any literature has dealt with that issue among the Chinese population so far.
In terms of the association between objective health status and SWB, few studies have ever been done. Uppal found that happiness of Canadians decreased with severity of disability and was independent of type of physical disability and mental disability had the strongest effect.23 Böckerman et al. found that among the Finnish population, psychiatric disorders had the largest negative impact on SWB, while other types of chronic conditions all had a significantly negative effect but were less so. Those conditions included in the study were pulmonary, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, neurological, hearing and visual problems and other disorders.24 Under the context of China, no research has reported the association between objective health status and SWB yet.
The past decade has witnessed an emerging volume of literature exploring SWB of Chinese people. But most were limited to urban areas,25, 26 centred on the elderly,27 and generally investigated the relationship between SWB and socio-economic status.28, 29 In 2010, there were an estimated 674 million rural residents in China, comprising 50.3% of the population.30 Yet, the SWB literature provides few data regarding this group of people. As to the health-happiness relation among Chinese people, two studies have been conducted, one in urban areas31 and the other in rural regions.32 Researchers in both studies used the typical self-rated health question with five answer options to measure health status and confirmed the result found in Western countries that there was a significantly positive correlation between happiness and self-rated health. To better understand the contribution of health to SWB of Chinese people, it is important to examine the effect of both subjective health status and objective health status and it would be more reliable to compare the impact of different dimensions of subjective health status. By far, no such research has been carried out with representative samples of China's rural population.
To fill these gaps in current literature, the correlation was examined between health status and happiness of the general population in rural China, with special attention paid to the effect of objective health status and the multidimensional characteristics of subjective health status. Through empirical studies, the authors aimed to testify which dimension(s) of subjective health status had stronger effect on SWB than the others and whether subjective health status could adequately capture the full impact of objective health status on SWB in the context of rural China.
Section snippets
Methods
Data were drawn from ‘The Household Health Survey of Health-Related Quality of Life of China's General Population’, which was conducted from July to August in 2010. The questionnaire mainly included questions on socio-economic conditions, chronic and other diseases, hospitalization, health-related behaviour, SWB and EQ-5D. In the survey, 1800 households were sampled through the multistage stratified sampling, and the selection criteria were in line with those applied in China's 2008 National
Results
Over 20% of respondents in this study felt very happy, 68.8% reported rather happy, while only 9.4% and less than 1% reported not very happy and not at all happy respectively. The mean SWB was 3.1 in general (Table 1).
The proportion of male respondents was around 50%. Respondents in the age group of 15–44 years occupied 49.7%. And the educational level of primary school and below was reported by 56.1% of the respondents. The distribution of basic socio-economic statistics in this study were
Discussion
Through a unique dataset containing rich and relatively new information, the health-happiness correlation of Chinese rural residents was analysed. It is the first population-based analysis of the association between SWB and health states under the context of rural China. And it is also the first study that applies EQ-5D instead of the traditional single-item self-rated health question to examine the effect of different dimensions of subjective health status on SWB. These results showed that
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Yunqiu Dong for her helpful comments, the two anonymous reviewers for their enlightening suggestions, the investigators for their contribution to the household survey, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China for the funding support (70873064).
Ethical approval
Informed consent was obtained from each respondent before the corresponding interview was conducted. No private information was leaked during data analyses or used for non-academic purposes.
Funding
This research was
References (47)
Subjective well-being
J Soc Econ
(2010)- et al.
Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being
J Econ Psychol
(2008) - et al.
The impact of wealth on subjective well-being: a comparison of three welfare-state regimes
Res Soc Stratif Mobil
(2013) - et al.
The relationship between happiness, health, and socio-economic factors: results based on Swedish microdata
J Socio Econ
(2001) - et al.
Hypertension and happiness across nations
J Health Econ
(2008) Health status and healthy life measures for population health need assessment: modelling variability and uncertainty
Health Place
(2001)- et al.
Valuing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D health states using subjective well-being: a secondary analysis of patient data
Soc Sci Med
(2013) Impact of the timing, type and severity of disability on the subjective well-being of individuals with disabilities
Soc Sci Med
(2006)- et al.
Do established health-related quality-of-life measures adequately capture the impact of chronic conditions on subjective well-being?
Health Policy
(2011) - et al.
Life satisfaction in urban China: components and determinants
World Dev
(2008)
Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China
China Econ Rev
Gross national happiness as a framework for health impact assessment
Environ Impact Assess Rev
EuroQol: the current state of play
Health Policy
Regional differences in health status in China: population health-related quality of life results from the National Health Services Survey 2008
Health Place
A study of the relationship between health and subjective well-being in Parkinson's disease patients
Value Health
Great expectations? The subjective well-being of rural–urban migrants in China
World Dev
Subjective well-being: three decades of progress
Psychol Bull
Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life
Annu Rev Psychol
Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being
Appl Res Qual Life
On subjective well-being and quality of life
J Health Psychol
Beyond money toward an economy of well-being
Psychol Sci Public Interest
Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
How's life? 2013-measuring well-being
Cited by (22)
Does participation in poverty alleviation programmes increase subjective well-being? Results from a survey of rural residents in Shanxi, China
2021, Habitat InternationalCitation Excerpt :Thus, we expected a positive relationship between dependency ratio and subjective well-being. Suffering from an illness results in depression and anxiety, which, in turn, decreases subjective well-being (Steptoe et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015). Therefore, we assumed that people with illnesses exhibit lower subjective well-being.
A study on farmers' satisfaction and happiness after the land sale for urban expansion in India
2021, Land Use PolicyCitation Excerpt :Macro-environment factors such as inflation, unemployment, welfare systems, and public insurance are the significant factors influencing happiness (Tella et al., 2003; Wolfers, 2003; Tran et al., 2016). Demographical variables, i.e., age (Appleton and Song, 2008), health (Wang et al., 2015), income (Liu and Shang, 2012), employment (Chen et al., 2012), psychological factors (Bieda et al., 2019), social security system (Qi and Wu, 2018), community environment (Cheng and Smyth, 2015), commuting (Zhu and Fan, 2018; Yin et al., 2019), and air quality most significantly affect farmers' happiness (Zhang et al., 2017). Socioeconomic status includes power, prestige, and financial well-being (Oakes and Rossi, 2003) and represents a person's economic well-being to maintain an excellent living status.
Time Trade-Off Value Set for EQ-5D-3L Based on a Nationally Representative Chinese Population Survey
2018, Value in HealthCitation Excerpt :China had a population of 1.37 billion by the end of 2014 and 50% lived in rural areas [11]. A few studies on HRQOL using the EQ-5D about the Chinese population have been carried out in recent years [1–3,10,21,27,28]. In our study, we found that the values from rural populations were higher than the values from the urban populations.
Independent self-construal mediates the association between CYP19A1 gene variant and subjective well-being
2017, Consciousness and CognitionCitation Excerpt :Previous studies have demonstrated that confounding factors influence individuals’ subjective well-being (Dolan, Peasgood, & White, 2008; Røysamb, Tambs, Reichborn-Kjennerud, Neale, & Harris, 2003). Therefore, information about socioeconomic status (Haring, Stock, & Okun, 1984; Pinquart & Sörensen, 2000), number of siblings (Schnitzlein & Wunder, 2016), family type, caregivers, religious belief (Ellison, 1991; Witter, Stock, Okun, & Haring, 1985), life stress (McCullough, Huebner, & Laughlin, 2000; Seidlitz & Diener, 1993), life hopes (Demirli, Türkmen, & Arık, 2015), self-efficacy, self-consistency and congruence (Yu, Assor, & Liu, 2015; Yu, Zheng, Yan, & Wan, 2008), and mental health status (Suldo, Thalji, & Ferron, 2011; Wang, Jia, Zhu, & Chen, 2015) was collected. These factors were treated as potential confounding factors when investigating the effect of CYP19A1 Val80 on subjective well-being.
Factors shaping Americans’ objective well-being: A systems science approach with network analysis
2016, Journal of Policy ModelingCitation Excerpt :Since additional concerns of social and psychological factors have been gradually included besides the focus on the biological issues of illness and disease, health is recognized as a broad determinant closely related to well-being and quality of life (Placa & Knight, 2013). Along this line, several studies have reported that subjective and objective health problems, disability and mental ill-health are negatively related to low levels of well-being, as expected (Binder & Coad, 2013; Denny et al., 2014; Steptoe, Deaton, & Stone, 2015; Sun, Ji, & Kim, 2014; Wang, Jia, Zhu, & Chen, 2015). However, this negative association is weaker when individuals adapt to chronic disease circumstances (van Mierlo, van Heugten, Post, de Kort, & Visser-Meily, 2015) and due to the moderating effects of other determinants including income, social support and job satisfaction (Arber, Fenn, & Meadows, 2014; Dür et al., 2014; Emerson et al., 2014; Humboldt, Leal, & Pimenta, 2015; Sacco, Park, Suresh, & Bliss, 2014).
Bedtime negative affect, sleep quality and subjective health in rural China
2024, BMC Public Health