Public Health
Volume 124, Issue 2 , Pages 107-114, February 2010

Institutionalizing health impact assessment in London as a public health tool for increasing synergy between policies in other areas

  • J. Mindell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 7679 1269; fax: +44 20 7813 0242.
  • ,
  • C. Bowen

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Aboriginal Health, NSW Department of Health, Australia
  • ,
  • N. Herriot

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health, London, UK
  • ,
  • G. Findlay

      Affiliations

    • London Health Commission, London, UK
  • ,
  • S. Atkinson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Received 27 July 2009; received in revised form 8 December 2009; accepted 14 January 2010. published online 02 March 2010.

Summary 

Objectives

To describe the background to the inclusion of health impact assessment (HIA) in the development process for the London mayoral strategies, the HIA processes developed, how these evolved, and the role of HIA in identifying synergies between and conflicting priorities of different strategies.

Study design

Case series.

Methods

Early HIAs had just a few weeks for the whole HIA process. A rapid appraisal approach was developed. Stages included: scoping, reviewing published evidence, a stakeholder workshop, drafting a report, review of the report by the London Health Commission, and submission of the final report to the Mayor. The process evolved as more assessments were conducted. More recently, an integrated impact assessment (IIA) method has been developed that fuses the key aspects of this HIA method with sustainability assessment, strategic environmental assessment and equalities assessment.

Results

Whilst some of the early strategy drafts encompassed some elements of health, health was not a priority. Conducting HIAs was important both to ensure that the strategies reflected health concerns and to raise awareness about health and its determinants within the Greater London Authority (GLA). HIA recommendations were useful for identifying synergies and conflicts between strategies. HIA can be successfully integrated into other impact assessment processes.

Conclusions

The HIAs ensured that health became more integral to the strategies and increased understanding of determinants of health and how the GLA impacts on health and health inequalities. Inclusion of HIA within IIA ensures that health and health inequalities impacts are considered robustly within statutory impact assessments.

Keywords: Health impact assessment (HIA), Methodology, Policy, Integrated impact assessment, Rapid appraisal, Regional government, Evidence reviews

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Parts of this paper, and Fig. 1, Fig. 2, have appeared in a Canadian, French language, management journal Télescope and are published here with permission. Mindell J, Bowen C, Herriot N, Atkinson S. L'évaluation d'impact sur la santé: un instrument de santé publique dans le développement des stratégies régionales. [Health impact assessment: a public health instrument in the development of regional strategies]. Télescope 2008;14:26–37.

PII: S0033-3506(10)00011-9

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2010.01.007

Public Health
Volume 124, Issue 2 , Pages 107-114, February 2010