Public Health
Volume 124, Issue 2 , Pages 86-89, February 2010

Women's health: Explaining the trend in gender ratio in Iran over half a century (1956–2006)

  • F. Farzadi

      Affiliations

    • Iranian Institute for Health Science Research, Tehran, Iran
  • ,
  • B. Ahmadi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science, Ghods Avenue, Tehran 1417613191, Iran
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +98 21 88951391; fax: +98 21 88989129.
  • ,
  • B. Shariati

      Affiliations

    • Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  • ,
  • M. Alimohamadian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Ecology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  • ,
  • K. Mohamad

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

Received 18 August 2009; received in revised form 24 November 2009; accepted 3 January 2010. published online 24 February 2010.

Summary 

Objectives

Changes in gender ratio generally reflect differences in mortality rates in men and women. Female mortality rates, on the other hand, can be used as an index of the trends in women's health. This study looks at the trend in the population gender ratio from 1956 to 2006, with a focus on analysing mortality rates and hence the overall health of Iranian women over the last 50 years.

Study design

Cohort-type analysis using data from the last five population censuses in Iran.

Methods

Data were used to calculate gender ratios and analyse their trends over the 50-year period from 1956 to 2006.

Results

According to the 1956 Census, there were 98 men for every 100 women in the 25–34 years age group (male:female ratio=0.98). In the next census, conducted 10 years later (1966), the gender ratio increased to 121 in the 39–44 years age group. The discrepancy increased in later censuses; this trend indicates that mortality in the 25–34 years age group was significantly higher in 1956–1966 compared with subsequent decades. The social and economic crises of the 1940s probably left women of reproductive age exceptionally vulnerable to a wide range of adverse health outcomes. The fact that the trend ceased in 1976 with no further increase in the gender ratio may be due to improving social conditions and greater effectiveness of healthcare programmes directed at women.

Conclusion

As life expectancy is calculated on the basis of the conditional probability of death over specific intervals, the apparent discrepancy between the current gender ratios and life expectancy data may be due to higher female death rates before 1976.

Keywords: Population, Women, Gender ratio, Life expectancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(10)00002-8

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2010.01.001

Public Health
Volume 124, Issue 2 , Pages 86-89, February 2010