Public Health
Volume 123, Issue 4 , Pages 306-310 , April 2009

A review of the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative methods used in health impact assessment

  • E. O'Connell

      Affiliations

    • Chemical Hazards and Poisons Division, Health Protection Agency, London WC1V 7PP, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 207 759 2885.
    • ,
  • F. Hurley

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK

Received 24 September 2008 ,Accepted 17 February 2009.

References 

  1. World Health Organization . Health impact assessment: main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg consensus paper; European Centre for Health Policy, Brussels. 1999;
  2. Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A, Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Murray CJL, et al. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet. 2003;362:271–280
  3. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL. Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors, Vol. I and II. World Health Organization. World Health Organisation, Geneva. 2004;
  4. In:  Sanderson E,  Hurley F editor. Air pollution and the risks to human health – health impact assessment. AIRNET Work Group 4: risk and health impact assessment. 2005;Available from: http://airnet.iras.uu.nl/[accessed 05.09.08]
  5. Lopez AD. The evolution of the Global Burden of Disease framework for disease, injury and risk factor quantification: developing the evidence base for national, regional and global public health action. Globaliz Health. 2005;1:5
  6. Energy Technical Support Unit, Harwell Laboratory. ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Vol. 2. Methodology. European Commission, Luxembourg, 1995.
  7. Holland M, Berry J, Forster D. (eds.) ExternE: Externalities of Energy, Vol. 7. Methodology 1998 update. European Commission, Luxembourg, 1999.
  8. Integrated Assessment of Health Risks of Environmental Stressors in Europe. Imperial College London Consultants, London. Available from: http://www.intarese.org/2006;[accessed 05.09.08]
  9. Health and Environment Integrated Methodology and Toolbox for Scenario Assessment. Available from: http://www.heimtsa.eu/2007;[accessed 05.09.08]
  10. Dockery DW, Pope CA, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, et al. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1753–1759
  11. Pope CA, Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Dockery DW, Evans JS, Speizer FE, et al. Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 1995;151:669–674
  12. Pope CA, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA. 2002;287:1132–1141
  13. Laden F, Schwartz J, Speizer FE, Dockery DW. Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: extended follow-up of the Hazard Six Cities Study. Respir Crit Care. 2006;173:667–672
  14. Hoek G, Brunekreef B, Goldbohm S, Fischer P, van den Brandt PA. Association between mortality and indicators of traffic-related air pollution in the Netherlands: a cohort study. Lancet. 2002;360:1203–1209
  15. Nafstad P, Haheim LL, Wisloff T, Gram F, Oftedal B, Holme I, et al. Urban air pollution and mortality in a cohort of Norwegian men. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:610–615
  16. Filleul L, Rondeau V, Vandentorren S, Le Moual N, Cantagrel A, Annesi-Maesano I, et al. Twenty five year mortality and air pollution: results from the French PAARC survey. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:453–460
  17. Industrial Economics Incorporated . Expanded expert judgment assessment of the concentration-response relationship between PM2.5 exposure and mortality. US EPA. Cambridge, MA; 2006;Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/Uncertainty/pm_ee_report.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]
  18. Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants. Long-term exposure to air pollution: effect on mortality, (draft report for comment), Didcot, UK, 2007.
  19. Bellinger D, Leviton A, Waternaux C, Needleman H, Rabinowitz M. Longitudinal analyses of prenatal and postnatal lead exposure and early cognitive development. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1037–1043
  20. Bellinger DC, Stiles KM, Needleman HL. Low-level lead exposure, intelligence and academic achievement: a long-term follow-up study. Paediatrics. 1992;90:855–861
  21. Dietrich KN, Krafft K, Bornschein KM, Hammond PB, Berger O, Succop PA, et al. Low level foetal lead exposure effect on neurobehavioural development in early infancy. Paediatrics. 1987;80:721–730
  22. Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J, Yolton K, Baghurst P, Bellinger DC, et al. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:894–899
  23. Schwartz J. Low-level lead exposure and children's IQ: a meta-analysis and search for a threshold. Environ Res. 1994;65:42–45
  24. Medina S, Boldo E, Saklad M, Niciu EM, Krzyzanowski M, Frank F, et al. Contributing Members of the APHEIS Group Health impact assessment of air pollution and communications strategy: APHEIS (Air Pollution and Health: A European Information System) third year report, 2002–2003 (Apheis-3). 2005;Saint-Maurice Cedex, France. Available from: http://www.apheis.net[accessed 05.09.08]
  25. Hurley F, Hunt A, Cowie H, Holland M, Miller B, Pye S, et al. Methodology for the cost-benefit analysis for CAFE. Volume 2: Health impact assessment. European Commission; 2005;AEA Technology Environment, Didcot, UK. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/air/cafe/pdf/cba_methodology_vol2.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]
  26. Rabl A. Air pollution mortality: harvesting and loss of life expectancy. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005;68:1175–1180
  27. Miller BG, Hurley JF. Comparing estimated risks for air pollution with risks for other health effects. IOM Report TM/06/01. Edinburgh: Institute of Occupational Medicine; 2007;
  28. Brunekreef B, Miller BG, Hurley JF. The brave new world of lives sacrificed, and saved, deaths attributed and avoided. Epidemiology. 2007;18:785–788
  29. Holland M, Hurley F, Hunt A, Watkiss P. Methodology for the cost-benefit analysis for CAFÉ. Volume 3: Uncertainty in the CAFE CBA. Methods and first analysis. European Commission; 2005;AEA Technology Environment, Didcot, UK. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/air/cafe/activities/pdf/cba_method_vol3.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]
  30. Boldo E, Medina S, LeTertre A, Hurley F, Muecke HG, Ballester F, et al. Apheis Group Apheis: Health impact assessment of long-term exposure to PM2.5 in 23 European cities. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:449–458
  31. Medina S, Plasencia A, Artazcoz L, Quenel P, Katsouyanni K, Mucke H-G, et al. Contributing Members of the APHEIS Group. APHEIS health impact assessment of air pollution in 26 European cities. Second year, 2000–2001. Saint-Maurice Cedex, France, 2002. p. 225.
  32. Medina S, Plasencia A, Ballester F, Mucke HG, Schwarz J, APHEIS Group . Health impact of PM10 in 19 European cities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:831–836
  33. World Health Organization . Health aspects of air pollution with particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Report on a WHO Working Group, Bonn, Germany, 13–15 January 2003. World Health Organization, Copenhagen; 2003;Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/document/e79097.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]
  34. Watkiss P, Pye S, Holland M. CAFE CBA: baseline analysis, 2000–2020. European Commission: AEA Technology Environment, Didcot, UK; 2005;Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/air/cafe/activities/pdf/cba_baseline_results2000_2020.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]
  35. Holland M, Watkiss P, Pye S. Cost-benefit analysis of policy option scenarios for the Clean Air for Europe programme (benefits assessment, uncertainty analyses). European Commission; 2005;AEA Technology Environment, Didcot, UK. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/air/cafe/general/pdf/cba_thematic_strategy.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]
  36. Pruss Ustun A, Mathers C, Corvalan C, Woodward A. Introduction and methods: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels. WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series. No. 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003;p. 63
  37. Corvalan C, Kjellstrom T, Smith KR. Health, environment and sustainable development: identifying links and indicators to promote action. Epidemiology. 1999;10:656–660
  38. O'Connell E. Environmental burden of disease assessment for exposure to lead, outdoor air pollution, and unsafe drinking water in the Republic of Ireland. Doctoral dissertation. Dublin: University College Dublin; 2008. p. 480.
  39. World Health Organization . Health aspects of air pollution – answers to follow-up questions from CAFE. Report on a WHO Working Group meeting, Bonn, Germany, 15–16 January 2004. World Health Organization, Copenhagen; 2004;Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/document/e82790.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]
  40. Reidpath DD, Allotey PA, Kouame A, Cummins RA. Measuring health in a vacuum: Examining the disability weight of the DALY. Health, Policy and Planning. 2003;18:351–356
  41. Commission of the European Communities. Communication from the Commission: An EU Strategy for Biofuels {SEC(2006)142}. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/biomass/biofuel/com2006_34_en.pdf [accessed 02.03.09].
  42. Pye S, Norris J, Searl A, Watkiss P, Wilkins G, Pooley M. London low emission zone health impact assessment – final report – non-technical summary. Transport for London; 2006;Available from: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/roadusers/lez/LEZ-Health-Impact-Assessment-Summary.pdf[accessed 05.09.08]

PII: S0033-3506(09)00040-7

doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.02.008

Public Health
Volume 123, Issue 4 , Pages 306-310 , April 2009

Article Tools