Public Health
Volume 123, Issue 4 , Pages 339-345, April 2009

Annoyance and health symptoms and their influencing factors: A population-based air pollution intervention study

  • T. Stenlund

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Sweden
    • Department of Educational Measurement, Umeå University, Sweden
  • ,
  • E. Lidén

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden
  • ,
  • K. Andersson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden
  • ,
  • J. Garvill

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Sweden
  • ,
  • S. Nordin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Sweden
    • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. Tel.: +46 90 7866006; fax: +46 90 7866695.

Received 25 June 2008; received in revised form 13 November 2008; accepted 16 December 2008. published online 06 April 2009.

Summary 

Objectives

Interventions for reducing air pollution are important means for improving public health. The role of psychological factors in understanding annoyance and health symptoms due to air pollution is limited and further investigation is required. This study aimed to investigate the effects of an intervention to reduce air pollution (predominantly dust and soot) with respect to perceived pollution, risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms. Another objective was to test a model that describes inter-relations between air pollution, perceived pollution, health risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms.

Study design

An interventional, population-based questionnaire study.

Methods

Surveys were performed before (pre-test) and after (post-test) closure of a sinter plant. Instead, pellets were shipped to the community's harbour for steel production. Individuals in the community aged 18–75 years were selected at random for participation in the pre-test (n=738; 74% of the sample participated) and post-test (n=684; 68% of the sample participated). The two samples were representative of the populations at the two points in time, and thus not identical.

Results

After the sinter plant was closed, the environment was perceived as being less dusty, the residents were more positive in their risk perception, and they reported less annoyance due to dust, soot and odorous substances. No difference was found for health symptoms between the pre-test and the post-test. Based on path analyses, a model is proposed of inter-relations between air pollution, perceived pollution, health risk perception, annoyance and health symptoms.

Conclusion

The intervention was successful with respect to perceived dust and soot pollution; to annoyance attributed to dust, soot and odorous substances; and to risk perception. The path analyses suggest that perceived pollution and health risk perception play important roles in understanding and predicting environmentally induced annoyance and health symptoms.

Keywords: Epidemiology, Dust, Soot, Odour, Perception, Risk

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(08)00356-9

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.021

Public Health
Volume 123, Issue 4 , Pages 339-345, April 2009