Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 11 , Pages 1191-1198 , November 2008

Engaging communities to tackle anti-social behaviour: a health impact assessment of a citizens' jury

Received 10 April 2007 ,Revised 17 January 2008 ,Accepted 22 February 2008.

References 

  1. Wood M. Perceptions and experience of antisocial behaviour: findings from the 2003/2004 British Crime Survey. Report No. 49 London: Home Office; 2004;
  2. Hunter C, Nixon J, Parr S, Greenwood A. What works for victims and witnesses of anti-social behaviour. London: Home Office; 2004;
  3. Armitage R. Tackling anti-social behaviour: what really works. Community safety practice briefing. London: NACRO; 2002;
  4. Christmann K, Rogerson M. Crime, fear of crime and quality of life: identifying and responding to problems. Report No. 35 London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit; 2004;
  5. Kashefi E, Mort M. Grounded citizens' juries: a tool for health activism?. Health Expect. 2004;7:290–302
  6. Smith G, Wales C. Citizen juries and deliberative democracy. Polit Stud. 2000;48:51–65
  7. Wakefield T. Citizens juries: a radical alternative for social research. Report No. 37 Guildford: Department of Sociology, University of Surrey; 2002;
  8. Breeze J, Danczuk S, Patterson P. Anti-social behaviour: Netherley and Valley Citizen's Jury report. 21. Manchester: Vision; 2004;
  9. European Centre for Health Policy . Gothenburg consensus paper: health impact assessment main concepts and suggested approach. Brussels: European Centre for Health Policy; 1999;
  10. Scott-Samuel A, Birley M, Ardern K. The Merseyside guidelines for health impact assessment. Liverpool: IMPACT; 2001;
  11. Abrahams D, den Broeder L, Doyle C, Fehr R, Haigh F, Mekel O, et al. European Policy Health Impact Assessment: a guide. Liverpool: IMPACT University of Liverpool; 2004;
  12. Coggins T, Cooke A, Friedli L, Nichols J, Scott-Samuel A, Stansfield J. Mental well-being impact assessment: a toolkit. Hyde: Care Services Improvement Partnership North West Development Centre; 2007;
  13. Tyrer D, Bidwell H. Liverpool City Council Anti-social Behaviour Citizens' Jury: 3rd follow up meeting: 21st April 2005. 21. Manchester: Vision; 2005;
  14. Tyrer D, Bidwell H. Liverpool City Council Anti-social Behaviour Citizens' Jury: 2nd follow up meeting: 14th December 2004. 21. Manchester: Vision; 2004;
  15. Breeze J, Patterson P. Liverpool City Council Anti-social Behaviour Citizens' Jury: 1st follow up meeting: 31st August 2004. 21. Manchester: Vision; 2004;
  16. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. Polices and strategies to promote social equity in health. Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies; 1991;
  17. Hunter C, Nixon J. Taking the blame and losing the home: women and anti-social behaviour. J Soc Welfare Fam Law. 2001;23:395–410
  18. Chandola T. The fear of crime and area differences in health. Health Place. 2001;7:105–116
  19. Whitley R, Prince M. Fear of crime, mobility and mental health in inner-city London, UK. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1678–1688

PII: S0033-3506(08)00055-3

doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.02.008

Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 11 , Pages 1191-1198 , November 2008