Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 10 , Pages 1013-1019, October 2008

‘Topping up’ methadone: An analysis of patterns of heroin use among a treatment sample of Scottish drug users

  • M. Bloor

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, 89 Dumbarton Road, Glasgow G11 6PW, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 (0) 141 330 2670; fax: +44 (0) 141 330 2820.
  • ,
  • J. McIntosh

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, 89 Dumbarton Road, Glasgow G11 6PW, UK
  • ,
  • N. McKeganey

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, 89 Dumbarton Road, Glasgow G11 6PW, UK
  • ,
  • M. Robertson

      Affiliations

    • Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Received 14 February 2007; received in revised form 29 November 2007; accepted 30 January 2008.

Summary 

Objectives

To determine: (a) whether Scottish drug users on methadone maintenance use heroin less frequently than their peers following other forms of drug treatment; and (b) to what extent those on methadone maintenance ‘top up’ with heroin.

Design

A cohort study followed-up for 33 months from 2001 to 2004.

Methods

Four hundred and ten interviewees who responded at all four interview sweeps, recruited as new treatment entrants from 28 drug treatment agencies across Scotland.

Results

Sixty-eight of the 401 interviewees had commenced an episode of methadone-maintenance treatment at the start of the study. There was no significant difference between the methadone-maintained sample and the other interviewees in their propensity to abstain from heroin use, nor was there any difference between the two groups in the mean reduction over time in their self-reported dependence on drugs. However, if the outcome measure used is the change (between baseline and 33 months) in the number of days that the interviewee reported having used heroin in the previous 3 months, the reduction in the number of days that heroin was used was significantly greater (52 days) in the methadone-maintained group than in the rest of the sample (36.4 days). This fall in the number of days of heroin use was greater still if the comparison was restricted to those who had continued on methadone-maintenance treatment, although 67.4% of those still on methadone maintenance had ‘topped up’ with heroin at some point in the 3 months prior to 33-month follow-up. Those on higher maintenance doses were not significantly more likely to have reduced the number of days on which they used heroin compared with those on lower doses, and those still on methadone maintenance were not more likely to have reduced their criminality (measured by the number of days on which they committed acquisitive crimes in the previous 3 months) compared with the rest of the sample.

Conclusions

Methadone-maintained drug users are not more likely to achieve abstinence than drug users receiving other forms of treatment, but they are significantly more likely to achieve a reduction in the frequency of their illicit drug use; they ‘top up’ on methadone, but the frequency of their illicit drug use is less than that of drug users in other treatment modalities. These data confirm the value of methadone-maintenance services as part of a ‘mixed economy’ of services for the treatment of drug use.

Keywords: Methadone maintenance, Drug use, Cohort study

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(08)00037-1

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2008.01.007

Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 10 , Pages 1013-1019, October 2008