Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 6 , Pages 602-612, June 2008

A survey of tuberculosis clinic provision in England and Wales

  • Sooria Balasegaram

      Affiliations

    • National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, Royal College of Physicians, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Robert Grant

      Affiliations

    • National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, Royal College of Physicians, UK
  • ,
  • Peter Ormerod

      Affiliations

    • East Lancashire NHS Trust, UK
  • ,
  • Jonathan Mant

      Affiliations

    • University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • John Hayward

      Affiliations

    • Newham Primary Care Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Derek Lowe

      Affiliations

    • National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, Royal College of Physicians, UK
  • ,
  • Alistair Story

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, UK

Received 1 March 2007; received in revised form 27 July 2007; accepted 24 September 2007.

Summary 

Background

This paper presents the methods and findings of a survey of current service configuration in tuberculosis screening, treatment and prevention in England and Wales, which was conducted as part of the development of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines on tuberculosis for the country.

Methods

A random sample of health protection units (HPUs) was surveyed (stratified geographically) in England. For Wales, National Health Service boundaries were used. There was a 100% sample of HPUs (33 clinics) in London and a 50% sample (81 clinics) outside London. The survey was completed by nurses in tuberculosis clinics. The questionnaire asked for details of caseload in terms of active disease (notified cases) and latent infection (screening and chemoprophylaxis), and the different types of specialist tuberculosis services offered.

Results

Completed surveys were obtained from 67 of 81 clinics outside London and all 33 clinics in London. An association was found between the number of notifications and personnel, in line with previous British Thoracic Society guidelines. Higher notification areas, especially in London, provide additional specialist services such as human immunodeficiency virus/tuberculosis clinics and specialist paediatric clinics. Clinics in London also reported higher usage of incentives, directly observed therapy (DOT) and free prescriptions. Low notification areas outside London tend to see more patients at home for contact tracing and treatment review. However, there is considerable variation in the use of DOT and chemoprophylaxis that is not entirely explained by differences in caseload.

Conclusions

The survey showed that service configuration was organized in different ways in both high and low incidence areas. There is a need to share good practice and explore ways to configure services effectively in line with local needs.

Keywords: Tuberculosis, Health service provision

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(07)00321-6

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.09.015

Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 6 , Pages 602-612, June 2008