Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 4 , Pages 397-403, April 2008

Injecting drug use is associated with HIV risk perception among Mexican Americans in the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, USA

  • E.J. Essien

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Community Health, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Texas Medical Center, 1441 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    • University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
  • ,
  • G.O. Ogungbade

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Community Health, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Texas Medical Center, 1441 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
  • ,
  • D. Ward

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
  • ,
  • M.E. Fernandez-Esquer

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
  • ,
  • C.R. Smith

      Affiliations

    • The Valley AIDS Council, Harlingen, TX, USA
  • ,
  • L. Holmes Jr.

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Community Health, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Texas Medical Center, 1441 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    • University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Institute of Community Health, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Texas Medical Center, 1441 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Tel.: +17137958351; fax: +17137958383.

Received 17 October 2006; received in revised form 7 May 2007; accepted 16 July 2007.

Summary 

Objectives

Injecting drug use (IDU) remains an actual risk variable in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in most ethnic populations, and the association between actual risk and individual perception of HIV risk varies across studies and samples. This study aimed to examine the relationship between IDU and HIV risk perception among Mexican Americans residing in Rio Grande Valley, South Texas.

Study design

A cross-sectional study of IDU as a predictor of HIV risk perception.

Methods

Two hundred and seventy-five participants [IDUs 11.9%, non-IDUs 88.1%] were assessed for an association between IDU and individual risk perception for HIV infection, as well as history of drug use and HIV risk perception, using Chi-squared statistic for independence and a logistic regression model for the prevalence odds ratio (POR).

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between IDUs and non-IDUs with respect to the sociodemographic variables, except for income and gender (P<0.05). The results indicated a statistically significant decrease in HIV risk perception among IDUs compared with non-IDUs, after adjustment for age, gender, sexual preference, history of drug use and marital status [POR 0.26, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.11–0.65]. Likewise, history of drug use was associated with decreased HIV risk perception (POR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.98).

Conclusions

These results suggest an inverse correlation between actual risk of HIV infection, such as IDU, and HIV risk perception. Therefore, assessment of HIV risk perception, which is a significant determinant of behaviour change, is essential to reduce the prevalence of HIV infection in the targeted population.

Keywords: Injecting drug use, Mexican Americans, Hispanics, Drug use, HIV risk perception

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(07)00280-6

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.07.023

Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 4 , Pages 397-403, April 2008