Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 42-52 , January 2008

Inequalities in the reported offer and uptake of antenatal screening

  • Fiona Alderdice

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +4402890976566; fax:+4402890976598.
  • ,
  • Jenny McNeill

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
  • ,
  • Rachel Rowe

      Affiliations

    • National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • ,
  • Denis Martin

      Affiliations

    • Altnagelvin Area Hospital, Londonderry, UK
  • ,
  • Jim Dornan

      Affiliations

    • Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast, UK

Received 17 November 2006 ,Revised 6 April 2007 ,Accepted 14 May 2007.

References 

  1. Bonnet D, Coltri A, Butera G, Fermont L, Le Bidois J, Kachaner J, et al. Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation. 1999;99:916–918
  2. Tworetzky W, McEhlinney DB, Reddy VM, Brook MM, Hanley FL, Silverman NH. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation. 2001;103:1269–1273
  3. Wald NJ, Huttly WJ, Hennessy CF. Down's syndrome screening in the UK in 1998. Lancet. 1999;354:1264
  4. Harris R, Lane B, Harris H, et al. National Confidential Enquiry into counselling for genetic disorders by non-geneticists: general recommendations and specific standards for improving care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:658–663
  5. Rowe R, Garcia J, Davidson L. Social and ethnic inequalities in the offer and uptake of prenatal screening and diagnosis in the UK: a systematic review. Public Health. 2004;118:177–189
  6. Lyn F, Alderdice F. Report. Current trends in antenatal screening services: results from a regional survey. Belfast: Queens University Belfast; 2006.
  7. Gordon D, Shaw M, Dorling D, Smith GD. Inequalities in health. The evidence presented to the Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health, chaired by Sir Donald Acheson. Bristol: The Policy Press; 1999.
  8. Chief Medical Officer. The health of the public of Northern Ireland. DHSSPS; 2001.
  9. Registrar General Northern Ireland. 1998 Annual report. The Stationery Office Ltd; 1999.
  10. DHSSPS. Final draft. Guidance on the termination of pregnancy in Northern Ireland. 2007. Available at: 〈http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/guidance-termination-of-pregnancy-ni-draft-jan07.pdf〉.
  11. Francome C. Gynaecologists and abortion in Northern Ireland. J Biosoc Sci. 1994;26:389–394
  12. Health Promotion Agency. Fact sheet on abortion. Sexual Health Information; 2005.
  13. Garel M, Gosme-Seguret S, Kaminski M, Cuttini M. Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: a qualitative survey among physicians and midwives. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:811–817
  14. Williams C, Sandall J, Lewando-Hundt G, Heyman B, Spencer K, Grellier R. Women as moral pioneers?. Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1983–1992
  15. Birth Control Trust. Birth control and abortion. Unpublished data; 1992–1994.
  16. Campbell R, Stevenson L. Community differentials in health in Northern Ireland. DHSS NI; 1993.
  17. O’Reilly D, Stevenson M. The two communities in Northern Ireland: deprivation and ill health. J Public Health Med. 1998;20:161–168
  18. Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS). New targeting social need action plan. DHSSPS; October 2000.
  19. Danesh J, Gault S, Appleby P, et al. Postcodes as useful markers of social class: population based study in 26,000 British households. BMJ. 1999;318:843–845
  20. Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A. Health and deprivation: inequality in the North. Beckenham: Croom Helm; 1988;
  21. Anderson JE, Koenig LJ, Lampe MA, Wright R, Leiss J, Saul J. Achieving universal HIV screening in prenatal care in the United States: provider persistence pays off. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2005;19:247–252
  22. The UK Collaborative Group for HIV and STI Surveillance. A complex picture: HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the United Kingdom: 2006. London: Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections; 2006.
  23. Jha S, Gee H, Coomarasamy A. Women's attitudes to HIV screening in pregnancy in an area of low prevalence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110:145–148
  24. Jones D. Understanding why women decline HIV screening. RCM Midwives J. 2004;7:344–347
  25. Dormandy E, Michie S, Hooper R, Marteau T. Low uptake of prenatal screening for Down's syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: a reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choice?. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:346–352
  26. Jacques AM, Sheffield LJ, Halliday JL. Informed choice in women attending private clinics to undergo first-trimester screening for Down's syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:656–664
  27. Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. What constitutes ‘balanced information in the practitioners’ portrayals of Down's syndrome. Midwifery. 2002;18:230–237
  28. Santalahti P, Aro AR, Hemminki E, Helenious H, Ryynanen M. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:153–165
  29. Lobel M, Dias L, Meyer BA. Distress associated with prenatal screening for fetal abnormality. J Behav Med. 2005;28:65–76
  30. Marteau TM, Johnston M, Shaw RW, Slack J. Factors influencing the uptake of screening for open neural-tube defects and amniocentesis to test for Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:739–741

PII: S0033-3506(07)00166-7

doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.05.004

Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 42-52 , January 2008