Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 53-60 , January 2008

A conditional probability approach to surveillance system sensitivity assessment

References 

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1988;37(Suppl 5):1–18
  2. German RR. Sensitivity and predictive value positive measurements for public health surveillance systems. Epidemiology. 2000;11:720–727
  3. Gallay A, Nardone A, Vaillant V, Desenclos JC. [The capture–recapture applied to epidemiology: principles, limits and application]. Rev Épidémiol Santé Publique. 2002;50:219–232
  4. Bailey TC, Carvalho MS, Lapa TM, Souza WV, Brewer MJ. Modeling of under-detection of cases in disease surveillance. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15:335–343
  5. Romaguera RA, German RR, Klaucke DN. Evaluating public health surveillance. In:  Teusch S,  Churchill E editor. Principles and practice of public health surveillance. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994;p. 176–192
  6. Reintjes R, Termorshuizen F, van de Laar MJ. Assessing the sensitivity of STD surveillance in the Netherlands: an application of the capture–recapture method. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;122:97–102
  7. Doyle TJ, Glynn MK, Groseclose SL. Completeness of notifiable infectious disease reporting in the United States: an analytical literature review. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:866–874
  8. Hook EB, Regal RR. Capture–recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17:243–264
  9. Nardone A, Decludt B, Jarraud S, Etienne J, Hubert B, Infuso A, et al. Repeat capture–recapture studies as part of the evaluation of the surveillance of Legionnaires’ disease in France. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;131:647–654
  10. Hook EB, Regal RR. Accuracy of alternative approaches to capture–recapture estimates of disease frequency: internal validity analysis of data from five sources. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:771–779
  11. Brenner H. Application of capture–recapture methods for disease monitoring: potential effects of imperfect record linkage. Methods Inf Med. 1994;33:502–506
  12. St. Lawrence JS, Montano DE, Kasprzyk D, Phillips WR, Armstrong K, Leichliter JS. STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1784–1788
  13. Figueiras A, Lado E, Fernandez S, Hervada X. Influence of physicians’ attitude on under-notifying infectious diseases: a longitudinal study. Public Health. 2004;118:521–526
  14. Seneviratne SL, Gunatilake SB, de Silva HJ. Reporting notifiable diseases: methods for improvement, attitude and community outcome. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1997;91:135–137
  15. Weiss BP, Strassburg MA, Fannin SL. Improving disease reporting in Los Angeles County: trial and results. Public Health Rep. 1988;103:415–421
  16. Buehler JW. Surveillance. In:  Rothman KJ,  Greenland S editor. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998;p. 435–457

PII: S0033-3506(07)00149-7

doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.011

Public Health
Volume 122, Issue 1 , Pages 53-60 , January 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution