Public Health
Volume 121, Issue 9 , Pages 690-695, September 2007

Implications of the International Health Regulations (2005) for communicable disease surveillance systems: Tunisia's experience

  • S. Lyons

      Affiliations

    • European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training, Department of Epidemic and Pandemic Alert & Response, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +41227915860; fax: +41227911374.
  • ,
  • A. Zidouh

      Affiliations

    • Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, The World Health Organization, Cairo, Egypt
  • ,
  • M. Ali Bejaoui

      Affiliations

    • Direction des Soins de Santé de Base, Tunis, Tunisia
  • ,
  • M. Ben Abdallah

      Affiliations

    • Institut de Cancérologie Salah Azaïez, Tunis, Tunisia
  • ,
  • S. Amine

      Affiliations

    • Département de Microbiologie, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisia
  • ,
  • M. Garbouj

      Affiliations

    • Direction des Soins de Santé de Base, Tunis, Tunisia
  • ,
  • J. Fitzner

      Affiliations

    • World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Received 3 June 2006; received in revised form 17 January 2007; accepted 20 February 2007.

Abstract 

Background

In May 2005, the revised International Health Regulations, known as IHR (2005), were adopted in response to the evolving nature of communicable diseases (CD) and the rapid increase in global trade and travel. CD surveillance is an integral part of a country's core requirements under the regulations.

Methods

The implications of these requirements were assessed as part of a review of the national CD surveillance system of Tunisia using a qualitative methodology of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT).

Results

Tunisia is some way towards meeting the requirements of IHR (2005) while some specific areas that need to be addressed are highlighted for improvement: standardization of surveillance documents, strengthening the role of the laboratory in surveillance, increased human resources and training.

Conclusions

Tunisia's experience can offer some lessons to other countries in this process. While meeting the capacity obligations of IHR (2005) requires investment and commitment, this investment will enable countries to better protect themselves against public health emergencies arising within their borders and threatening from elsewhere in the world.

Keywords: Revised international health regulations, Surveillance, Communicable disease, Tunisia

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(07)00076-5

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.02.013

Public Health
Volume 121, Issue 9 , Pages 690-695, September 2007