Public Health
Volume 121, Issue 1 , Pages 3-17, January 2007

Exploring differences in caseloads of rural and urban healthcare providers in Alaska and New Mexico

  • Christiane Brems

      Affiliations

    • University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3401 E. 42nd Street, Suite 200, AK 99508, USA. Tel.: +19075612880; fax: +19075612895.
  • ,
  • Mark E. Johnson

      Affiliations

    • University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
  • ,
  • Teddy D. Warner

      Affiliations

    • University of New Mexico School of Medicine, USA
  • ,
  • Laura Weiss Roberts

      Affiliations

    • Medical College of Wisconsin, USA

Received 8 February 2006; received in revised form 22 June 2006; accepted 19 July 2006.

Summary 

Objectives

Although it is commonly accepted that rural healthcare providers face demands that are both qualitatively and quantitatively different from those faced by urban providers, this conclusion is based largely on data from healthcare consumers and relies on qualitative work with small sample sizes, surveys with small sample sizes, theoretical reviews and anecdotal reports. To enhance our knowledge of the demands faced by rural healthcare providers and to gain the perspectives of healthcare providers themselves, this study explored the caseloads of rural providers compared with those of urban providers.

Method

An extensive survey of over 1500 licensed clinicians across eight physical and behavioural healthcare provider groups in Alaska and New Mexico was undertaken to explore differences in caseloads based on community size (small rural, rural, small urban, urban), state (Alaska, New Mexico) and discipline (health, behavioural).

Results

Findings indicated numerous caseload differences between community sizes that were consistent across both states, with complex case presentations being described most commonly by small rural and rural providers. Substance abuse, alcohol use, cultural diversity, economic disadvantage and age diversity were issues faced more often by providers in rural and small rural communities than by providers in small urban and urban communities. Rural, but not small rural, providers faced challenges around work with prisoners and individuals needing involuntary hospitalization. Although some state and discipline differences were noted, the most important findings were based on community size.

Conclusions

The findings of this study have important implications for provider preparation and training, future research, tailored resource allocation, public health policy, and efforts to prevent ‘burnout’ of rural providers.

Keywords: Rurality, Caseloads, Health care, Diversity, Rural–urban differences, USA

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(06)00251-4

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.07.031

Public Health
Volume 121, Issue 1 , Pages 3-17, January 2007