Public Health
Volume 121, Issue 2 , Pages 100-105, February 2007

Action on cycling in primary care trusts: Results of a survey of Directors of Public Health

  • Nick Cavill

      Affiliations

    • Cycling England, c/o 185A Moss Lane, Bramhall, Stockport, Cheshire, Sk7 IBA UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1614409127; fax: +8707625091.
  • ,
  • Harry Rutter

      Affiliations

    • South East Public Health Observatory
  • ,
  • Alison Hill

      Affiliations

    • South East Public Health Observatory
    • Cycling England, c/o 185A Moss Lane, Bramhall, Stockport, Cheshire, Sk7 IBA UK

Received 28 October 2005; received in revised form 30 May 2006; accepted 13 July 2006.

Summary 

Background

Cycling is a form of physical activity with the potential to make a significant contribution to improving public health; however, participation levels are decreasing. Primary-care trusts (PCTs) are in a position to influence local provision for cycling but the extent of their involvement in policy and practice on cycling is unknown. A survey of Directors of Public Health in PCTs was conducted to establish the level and type of PCT involvement in policies, strategies, programmes and projects on cycling.

Methods

Directors of Public Health on the Faculty of Public Health database were sent an e–mail inviting them to complete an online questionnaire that addressed key issues of PCT involvement with cycling.

Results

One hundred and sixty-five responses were received (49% of all PCTs). Thirty-two per cent of respondents said there was someone in the PCT with specific responsibility for cycling. Less than half of PCTs had the basic facilities to encourage staff or visitors to cycle to their premises. Around one in 10 said that cycling was included in their travel plan or local delivery plan, and 49% of respondents said that their physical activity strategy contained reference to cycling. Joint working on the local strategic partnership and community plan was common, with 94% and 82% of PCTs, respectively, saying they had worked with other agencies on these plans. Most PCTs (60%) had worked on the Local Transport Plan. Specific knowledge of cycling policy was low, and demand for additional resources high.

Conclusion

Cycling does not seem to be high on PCTs’ agendas, despite its great potential to improve public health. More could be done to ensure that cycling is given a far greater emphasis within the work of PCTs, notably PCT input into local transport plan development, and production of local physical activity strategies.

Keywords: Cycling, Primary care trusts, Survey

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(06)00213-7

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.07.025

Public Health
Volume 121, Issue 2 , Pages 100-105, February 2007