Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 4 , Pages 346-355, April 2006

A health promotion programme in Adventist and non-Adventist women based on Pender's model: A pilot study

  • J. Carreño

      Affiliations

    • Master of Public Health Program, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, USA
    • Adventist University of Chile, Chillán, Chile
  • ,
  • G. Vyhmeister

      Affiliations

    • Master of Public Health Program, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, USA
    • Adventist University of Chile, Chillán, Chile
  • ,
  • L. Grau

      Affiliations

    • Master of Public Health Program, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, USA
    • Adventist University of Chile, Chillán, Chile
  • ,
  • D. Ivanovic

      Affiliations

    • Master of Public Health Program, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, USA
    • Adventist University of Chile, Chillán, Chile
    • Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. Tel.: +56 2 678 1459; fax: +56 2 221 4030.
    web address

Received 6 August 2004; received in revised form 27 January 2005; accepted 17 August 2005.

Summary 

Objective

In the last decades, the epidemiological and demographic transition in Chile has resulted in a considerable increase in diet-related non-communicable chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a health promotion programme (HPP) on behaviour in terms of the dimensions of the health-promoting lifestyle profile (HPLP) based on Pender's model. Pender based his research on the development of a model that explains, predicts and modifies forms of behaviour that promote health; an HPP based on this model may achieve positive changes that promote a healthy lifestyle.

Study design

This was a comparative study and the participants were Seventh-Day Adventist Church women (SDAW) and non-Seventh-Day Adventist Church women (NSDAW) aged 20–45 years from the urban area of Villarrica, Ninth Region of Chile. From a population of 300 women (150 SDAW and 150 NSDAW), a random sample of 18 SDAW and 18 NSDAW was chosen. Both groups were comparable in age and socio-economic status. An HPP was undertaken for both groups between April and September 2002. The response rate was 100%.

Methods

The overall score and the scores for the six dimensions of the HPLP (self-actualization, health responsibility, exercise, nutrition, interpersonal support and stress management) were measured in the pre- and post-test periods. Statistical analysis was performed using the Sign test and Wilcoxon's test. Data were processed using the statistical analysis system.

Results

In both groups, the median scores increased significantly between the pre- and post-test periods for the overall HPLP score and the scores of the six dimensions. When comparing the median scores in SDAW with NSDAW, only the score for nutrition was significantly higher in SDAW than NSDAW in both the pre-test (P<0.0001) and post-test (P<0.0005) periods.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate that an HPP based on Pender's model improves behaviour related to a health-promoting lifestyle in both groups, but more so for the NASDW.

Keywords: Health promotion, Health education, Public health, Lifestyle, Behaviour, Pender's model, Chile

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(05)00275-1

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2005.08.023

Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 4 , Pages 346-355, April 2006