Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 5 , Pages 451-461 , May 2006

Using aggregate data on dispensed drugs to evaluate the quality of prescribing in urban primary health care in Sweden

  • B Wettermark

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
    • Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Utilization Research and Clinical Pharmacological Services, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 8 585 804 35; fax: +46 8 585 804 03.
    • ,
  • Ulf Bergman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Utilization Research and Clinical Pharmacological Services, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
    • ,
  • I Krakau

      Affiliations

    • Research Centre of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden

Received 24 March 2004 ,Revised 1 January 2005 ,Accepted 13 October 2005.

References 

  1. Holden J, Wilson R. The quality of prescribing in general practice. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9:17–23
  2. de Vries CS, Tromp TF, Blijleven W, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Prescription data as a tool in pharmacotherapy audit (I). General considerations. Pharm World Sci. 1999;21:80
  3. Hoven JL, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Vander Stichele RH. DURQUIM Scientific Indicators of prescribing quality in drug utilisation research: report of a Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005;60:831–41
  4. Powell AE, Davies HTO, Thomson RG. Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of healthcare: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:122–128
  5. Gervas J, Perez Fernandez M, Starfield BH. Primary care, financing and gatekeeping in western Europe. Fam Pract. 1994;11:307–317
  6. Government bill. National plan for development of healthcare. Prop. 1999/2000:149. Stockholm: Department of Social Affairs; 2000. [In Swedish].
  7. Wettermark B, Nyman K, Bergman U. Five years' experience of quality assurance and feedback with individual prescribing profiles at a primary healthcare centre in Stockholm, Sweden. Qual Prim Care. 2004;12:225–234
  8. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo: WHO Collaborationg Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology; 2001. http://www.whocc.no.
  9. Bergman U, Popa C, Tomson Y, Wettermark B, Einarson TR, Åberg H, et al. Drug utilisation 90%—a simple method for assessing the quality of drug prescribing. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54:113–118
  10. Sjöqvist F, Bergman U, Dahl M-L, Gustafsson L, Hensjö L-O. Drug and therapeutics committees: a Swedish experience. WHO Drug Info. 2002;16:207–213
  11. Carrin G. Drug prescribing: a discussion of its variability and (ir)rationality. Health Policy. 1987;7:73–94
  12. Forster DP, Frost CE. Use of regression analysis to explain the variation in prescribing rates and costs between family practitioner committees. Br J Gen Pract. 1991;41:67–71
  13. Baker D, Klein R. Explaining outputs of primary healthcare: population and practice factors. Br Med J. 1991;303:225–229
  14. Olesen F, Vedsted P, Norskov Nielsen J. Change in ranking order of prescribing patterns by age and sex standardization of the practice population-audit may be misleading. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1996;14:159–164
  15. Wilson RP, Hatcher J, Barton S, Walley T. Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. Br Med J. 1996;313:595–599
  16. Tamblyn R, McLeod P, Hanley JA, Girard N, Hurley J. Physician and practice characteristics associated with the early utilisation of new prescription drugs. Med Care. 2003;41:895–908
  17. Bjerrum L, Bergman U. Wide variation in the number of different drugs prescribed by general practitioners. A prescription database study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2000;18:94–98
  18. Department of Health. Prescriptions dispensed in the community: statistics for 1989 to 1999. Statistical bulletin 2000/20. London: Department of Health; 2000. http://www.doh.gov.uk/public/sb2020.htm.
  19. Wettermark B, Pehrsson A, Jinnerot D, Bergman U. DU90% prescribing profiles—a useful tool for quality assessment in primary health care in Stockholm. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12:499–510
  20. Bergman U, Andersson D, Friberg A, Hansson B-G, Landahl S, Lindström E, et al. Quality indicators for drug use and drug handling. Svensk Medicin Nr 66. Swedish Society of Medicine and the Swedish Medical Association; 1999 [In Swedish].
  21. Wahlström R, Tomson G, Diwan VK, Beermann B, Sterky G. Hyperlipidaemia in primary care—a randomised controlled trial on treatment information in Sweden: design and methodology. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1995;4:75–90
  22. Wahlström R, Tomson G, Diwan VK, Beermann B. An educational experiment in primary care in Sweden. Improving the management of hypercholesterolaemic patients at risk. Eur J Gen Pract. 1997;3:96–102
  23. Stålsby Lundborg C, Wahlström R, Diwan VK, Oke T, Mårtenson D, Tomson G. Combining feedback from simulated cases and prescribing, design and implementation of an educational intervention in primary care in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999;15:458–472
  24. Drury VWM. Repeat prescribing—a review. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982;32:42–45
  25. Harris C, Dajda R. The scale of repeat prescribing. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:649–653
  26. Feely J, Chan R, McManus J, O'Shea B. The influence of hospital-based prescribers on prescribing in general practice. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;16:175–181
  27. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The cochrane effective practice and organization of care review group. Br Med J. 1998;317:465–468
  28. Thomson O'Brian MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, Haynes RB, Freemantle N, Harvey EL. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (cochrane review). In: The cochrane library, issue 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2001.
  29. O' Connell DL, Henry D, Tomlins R. Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia. Br Med J. 1999;318:507–511

PII: S0033-3506(05)00267-2

doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.10.011

Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 5 , Pages 451-461 , May 2006

Article Tools