Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 3 , Pages 221-228, March 2006

Tideswell health survey: A population survey of the health needs and service utilization of a farming community

  • L. Syson-Nibbs

      Affiliations

    • Farm Out Health Project, Newholme Hospital, High Peak and Dales Primary Care Trust, Baslow Road, Bakewell DE45 1AD, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 01629817931.
  • ,
  • C. Saul

      Affiliations

    • School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  • ,
  • P. Cox

      Affiliations

    • The New Surgery, Parke Road, Tideswell, Buxton, UK

Received 4 January 2005; received in revised form 8 June 2005; accepted 19 September 2005.

Summary 

Objectives

In the UK, there have been no epidemiological studies focusing on the general health status of rural communities, despite the prevalence of rural deprivation and the widely acknowledged link between poverty and ill health. The primary objective of this study was to test the null hypothesis that no differences existed between the health status of the farming and non-farming populations registered with one general practice, in order to inform a local health needs assessment. The secondary objective was to test the suitability of the research method as a model for a wider study.

Study design

A postal questionnaire survey was undertaken with the total farming population (n=248) registered with Tideswell general practice, and matched with an equivalent random sample of non-farmers (n=248) from the remainder of the practice list. The main outcome measures were income, general health status, quality of life (EQ5D), musculoskeletal problems, mental health status and service utilization.

Results

Significant differences were found between the two groups. Farmers were identified as having health needs that were greater than those found in the local non-farming sample. In addition, the observed EQ5D value for farmers was found to be significantly lower than that found in social classes IV and V (0.78 vs 0.82) and the UK mean.

Conclusions

This modest controlled study is the first of its kind in the UK. Health inequalities and inequities were identified that may be generalizable to other UK hill farmers. However, a larger, wider epidemiological study across different types of farming groups is now required to gain a fuller understanding of the health status of this indigenous rural population. The methodology employed in this study was successful and could serve as a model for such a study.

Keywords: Farmers, Health inequalities, Rurality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(05)00234-9

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2005.09.005

Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 3 , Pages 221-228, March 2006