Congenital anomaly surveillance in England and Wales

References 

1. Office for Population Census and Surveys. The OPCS monitoring scheme for congenital malformations. A review by a Working Group of the Registrar General's Medical Advisory Committee. Occasional paper 43. London: OPCS; 1995.
2. Basic dysmorphology. University of South Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences. http://med.usd.edu/som/genetics/curriculum/2EDYSMO5.htm [accessed 31 October 2003].
3. Office for National Statistics. Mortality statistics: childhood, infant and perinatal. Review of the Registrar General in England and Wales, Series DH3, no. 34. London: ONS; 2002.
4. Office for National Statistics. The national congenital anomaly system. A guide for data users and suppliers. London: ONS; 2001.
5. Botting B. Evaluation of strategies to improve case ascertainment and data quality in the national congenital anomaly system. PhD thesis, University of London, London; 2002.
6. Boyd PA, Armstrong B, Dolk H, Botting B, Pattenden S, Abramsky L, et al. Congenital anomaly surveillance in England—ascertainment deficiencies in the national system. BMJ. 2005;330:27–31
   • CrossRef
7. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. Recommendations from the guidelines working group. MMWR 2001;50:1–35. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5030a5.htm [accessed 31 October 2003].
8. March of Dimes Perinatal Data Center. Maternal, infant, and child health in the United States; 2001. http://www.marchofdimes.com/professionals/681_1206.asp [accessed 31 October 2003].
9. Jones KL, Jones M, Fisher JC. A developmental approach to the classification of birth defects. Ann Plast Surg. 1985;14:135–141
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
10. Spranger J, Benirshke K, Hall JG, Lenz W, Lowry RB, Opitz JM. Errors of morphogenesis: concepts and terms. J Paediatr. 1982;100:160–165
11. Smith DW. Recognisable patterns of human deformation. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1982;
12. Hirata GI. Congenital anomalies and teratogenesis. In: Case based pediatrics for medical students and residents, Chapter IV. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Hawaii A. Burns School of Medicine; 2002. http://www.hawaii.edu/medicine/pediatrics/pedtext/s04c02.html [accessed 31 October 2003].
13. Seeds JW, Azizkhan RG. Congenital malformations—antenatal diagnosis, perinatal management and counselling. Germantown: Aspen Publications; 1990;[chapter 2]
14. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision. Geneva: WHO; 1993.
15. Congenital Anomaly Register and Information Service (CARIS), Wales. Annual report; 2001.
16. North Thames (West) Congenital Malformation Register. In: The OPCS monitoring scheme for congenital malformations. A review by a Working Group of the Registrar General's Medical Advisory Committee. Occasional paper 43. London: OPCS; 1995.
17. EUROCAT—European concerted action on congenital anomalies and twins. http://www.eurocat.ulster.ac.uk/whatis.html [accessed 31 October 2003].
18. Office for National Statistics. Series MB3 nos. 7 to 16. Congenital malformation statistics: notifications England and Wales. London: ONS; 1991–2001.
19. Misra TN, Dattani N, Majeed A. An evaluation of the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and Wales. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:368–373.