Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 3 , Pages 249-255, March 2006

Insights into training and examination performance from the first UK National Public Health Training Audit

  • R. Holland

      Affiliations

    • School of Medecine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1603 593574; fax: +44 1603 593752.
    • ,
  • A. Gilmore

      Affiliations

    • European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
    • ,
  • N. Hoysal

      Affiliations

    • South Huddersfield Primary Care Trust, UK
    • ,
  • S. Acquilla

      Affiliations

    • London Deanery, London, UK

Received 2 August 2004; received in revised form 11 May 2005; accepted 17 August 2005.

Summary 

Objectives

To investigate predictors of a supportive training relationship and examination success using data from the first UK Public Health Training Audit.

Study design

Secondary analysis of data from a national cross-sectional survey of UK public health trainees, conducted in April 2003.

Methods

All UK public health trainees were sent a questionnaire including questions on training experience and examination performance. Possible predictive factors of a supportive trainer–trainee relationship and success at Part I and Part II of Membership of Faculty of Public Health examinations were first investigated in univariate analyses, and subsequently using logistic regression.

Results

Two hundred and ninety responses were received (62% response). Supportive trainers gave feedback [odds ratio (OR)=11.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7–34.0, P<0.001], spent at least 1h/week with their trainee (OR=5.2, 95% CI 1.7–15.4, P=0.003), held 3-monthly progress meetings (OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.4–6.1, P=0.006), and encouraged wide training experience (OR=2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.4, P=0.016). Predictors of success in the Part I examination by the end of the second year of training were medical background (OR=4.4, 95% CI 1.6–12.2, P=0.004) and perceived adequacy of examination support (OR=4.2, 95% CI 1.7–10.0, P=0.001). Predictors of success in the Part II examination by the end of the fourth year of training were access to examiners (OR=4.6, 95% CI 1.3–16.2) and wide experience (OR=4.1, 95% CI 1.1–14.5).

Conclusion

Trainees feel supported when provided with adequate trainer contact time, feedback and wide experience. Part I examination success appears to be more likely amongst trainees with a medical background and those given examination support. Part II success is related to the breadth of a trainee's experience and access to examiner support.

Keywords: Trainee–trainer relationship, Examination performance, Postgraduate training

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0033-3506(05)00204-0

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2005.08.017

Public Health
Volume 120, Issue 3 , Pages 249-255, March 2006

Article Tools